F6 tornado damage reddit. Fujita revised it down to F5.

F6 tornado damage reddit However, the F6 rating was never officially applied to the tornado. . S. The Xenia tornado! Dr. Since the early 2010s, NWS has become much more analytic about building construction, contextual damage, and possible impacts of debris on Loyal Valley Texas F4 (May 11th, 1999) - This tornado was able to strip 720 feet of pavement from Road 152, has been argued to have had comparable damage to the Jarrell tornado despite being Rated F4. We have written many articles about the The building practices were different, materials different, surveying of damage different, no velocity radar data (which could give us a general comparison), lack of any photo evidence of similar damage indicators (say a 10 ton oil tank which is the same weight then and now, so distance traveled between two different tornadoes could give an the only 3 tornadoes to have a 210 damage point rating , all seem weaker then Smithville and that one major trench dig area from Philadelphia that was dug 2-3 feet deep. The 1974 Xenia Ohio tornado was initially rated an f6, before it was downgraded to an f5 as Ted Fujita considered f6 tornadoes to be “inconceivable” Reply reply Steve_Jobs_yes There was a few tornadoes where Dr Fujita or NWS considered F6, but they just decided in the end to stick to F5 as the max. An F6 tornado would require wind speeds exceeding 300 mph. Second, the damage would be enormous. And many tornadoes likely had the strength to be F5 tornadoes but simply never hit enough structures to garner a rating. Historically there must be hundreds of tornadoes with 200mph winds that just never hit the “right kind” of structure to get their EF5 badge. Violent tornado damage truly is indescribable. interestingly El reno 2011 295 mph wind speed only had EF3 damage under that spot , and a mesonet reading of 151 mph only had EF0 damage at that spot , this shows tornadoes are severely under rated. There's no questioning it was a violent tornado, but I haven't seen any damage photos that truly proves it was anything more than a high-end EF4. I think the Hackleburg-Phil Campbell tornado and Smithville tornado occurred nearly the exact same time too. If the old Fujita scale were still in use, an F6 rating would’ve been considered. Because if so, I’m putting EF6 tornadoes someplace empty, and I’ll keep them in a very centralized area as to not cause any damage. That tornado was the worst in history at that time. For weather related articles, exciting weather events and… Business, Economics, and Finance. Ted Fugita actually studied the damage himself. gets more tornadoes due to the Rocky Mountains supplying cool, dry air and the Gulf of Mexico supplying the humid, warmer air. I made a claim immediately, like within an hour of the tornado. That being said any of the 2011 super outbreak EF5s could also be in the running, and Joplin threw 2x4s into concrete and lifted manhole covers and twisted the reinforced concrete-steel structure of an entire hospital. Probably the 1976 Jordan Iowa tornado, simply because Ted Fujita said it was a tornado that produced one of the most intense instances of damage he has ever seen. Slower tornadoes will generally cause more damage, as the structures endures high wind speeds for a longer period of time. 4: Cullman EF4 2011. A nighttime tornado that quickly formed and directly hit the town was the worst thing possible. 100 million in 1974. A tornado I experienced first hand in 1975 did F-5 damage where I lived but started as a waterspout at a state park lake in Mississippi. Oh yes, I’ve experienced a number of tornadoes living in Alabama during the few years I was there. [13] In 2001, tornado expert Thomas P. Side note-we’ve seen kids playing in big puddles/adults walking through water, please do not do that or let your kids do that (live electric wires could be touching the water, sharp debris could be hidden in there). I want to say I read somewhere that buildings that aren't directly anchored to their foundations can be hit by an EF5, but the tornado may not be given an EF5 rating since the structure doesn't yield a reliable damage report. The Moore tornado in 1999 was measured by doppler radar to have winds of almost 318mph, which was 2mph off of an F6 (on the OLD scale). Oct 26, 2023 · Disclaimer: Today we're discussing the theoretical concept of the F6 Tornado. Was a large multivortex tornado that moved extremely fast and caused 120 million in damage. To me it is the most inconceivable damage ever done by a tornado I use inconceivable because that's what Dr fujita would have said as it could be rated as an F6 as that's what he rated Xenia Ohio If you want any kind of indication of how extreme this one tornado was. It looks like something you'd see in one of those faux "F6 TORNADO" videos. "One Day in May: The 1997 Jarrell Texas Tornado Disaster. No. The tornado exhibited a multiple-vortex structure and became very large as it approached town. It's not as simple as people disagreeing with the DIs and honestly, when you read some of the damage surveys or listen to the rating being discussed I can absolutely see why people dispute the ratings. As for the recent tornado outbreak, Rolling Fork, MS had a lot of poorly constructed housing. it is to note base on photogrammetry the Elie tornado of 2007 in Canada (only official f5 in Canada) had winds of around 250-310 mph and the pampa tornado of 1995 had winds of 260-300 mph. - A community for sharing information, theories, art, research, humour, memes and encounters or experiences of Bigfoot/Sasquatch. 30K subscribers in the meteorology community. Two students unfortunately died as soon as they got into their car to get ahead of the upcoming storm, got picked up by the tornado, and died. Our piddly little skyscrapers and even the hills we think “protect” us from tornadoes actually have minimal effect on the tornado circulation. I believe all the tornadoes listed were separate tornadoes or a family of tornadoes. The car damage here is some of the worst cases of car damage from a tornado really ever documented, up there with smithville, vilonia, and other intense EF5's/EF4's/EF3's Reply reply Forest_robot The structural damage seems to be mainly from trees fallen on buildings. The costliest tornado of the day for the state was an F2 that affected Northeast OKC, including Frontier City. 3: Bridgeport EF4 2011. Jarrell was completely violent and it's just HORRIFYING knowing how much damage this tornado caused and what it put the victims through. The issue is more that tornado alley is possibly shifting Eastward where more people live. 120K subscribers in the tornado community. In one of the largest tornado outbreaks in history, 148 tornadoes form across 13 US states and Ontario, killing 335 people and causing $843 million ($5. Welcome to the meme-corner of /r/ForHonor. That's why the Enhanced Fujita scale left EF5 open ended. I’ve been in a few tornado warnings but being so close to major areas it’s very rare and most around here are further out into rural areas not close enough to me for a warning. It likely wasn't even the strongest tornado of the day on April 3rd (Guin showed arguably worse damage). While a larger damage area means a larger sample size for the damage survey, severity of damage surveyed determines the final rating. There’s another YouTuber who has similar type videos (searching for tornado scars on Google Maps) but I can’t remember his name. Most houses weren’t anchor bolted to the ground but used nails. it's just horrifying how destructive this tornado was, you'd never expect a simple The overall size of the El Reno tornado was 2. Grazulis stated in his book F5–F6 Tornadoes; "In my opinion, if there ever was an F6 tornado caught on video, it was the Pampa, Texas tornado of 1995". Photos 3-4: Waterspouts in Twister (1996) and August 2020 Gulf of waterspouts. If memory serves me correctly, the build of the structure itself can also play a factor in what EF rating a tornado gets. Then I would start up one of those tornado tour group businesses and profit like a mofo. He said he, coincidentally, arrived in Xenia that day directly after it had gone through. 2. a collection of every rated EF6 since the NWS officially accepted in August of 2030. Yep technically F6 or EF6 doesn’t technically exist but the 1974 Xenia tornado was classified as an F6 at first by Tetsuya Fujita whom created the original Fujita scale and always believed an F6 tornado to be possible. Tornado researchers like Thomas Marshall have speculated about F6 tornadoes based on damage surveys 228 votes, 53 comments. From the origins of the Fujita Scale, the two tornadoes that initially received If we had the old Fujita scale still in service and it was still the 1970s, I’d say the Smithville tornado could’ve been rated F6 if needed. EF5 vs Brick Home. This was the first time that so many violent tornadoes had been observed in a single outbreak (and the 1974 outbreak still holds the record for the most violent tornadoes), and Fujita felt that the damage at Xenia was the most intense of those. The neighbor had a metal shed flattened and was slid under their car in the driveway. Two tornadoes were preliminarily rated as F6s: Lubbock 1970 and Xenia 1974. In Jarrell the plumbing was torn out of houses. 6 miles at one point: everything was inside the tornado, including many storm chasers that had to make desperate last second escapes once it became apparent that the tornado was a lot bigger than what they thought and they were inside the outer circulation. It's crazy town got even that much time. 27 of the 131 residents of Double Creek were killed. ”[11] In 2001, tornado expert Thomas P. One currently near Nashville looks like it could develop into a very strong tornado I believe two of them happened before the hatched risk was even revealed. This tornado had basically EF-5 damage along almost its entire path and was rolling along at around 60+ mph. The Fujita and enhanced Fujita scale are purely damage scales, and are only rated by the damage a tornado does. for radar Wind-Velocity --keep note for something Smithville did the same damage while moving at 70mph. pretty much NWS has strange errors and bias for some tornadoes (at least they recently fix the jarrell path problem). Citations: Anna, Carly. My Mom’s sister was coming home from work when the sirens went off. Missiles, such as cars and refrigerators would do serious secondary damage that could not be directly identified 67 votes, 47 comments. Add in the long stretches of pavement pulled up and a huge swathe of deep ground scouring and you have an exceptionally strong storm. He had no idea there was a tornado (unbelievable, how do you miss that thing?!) until he saw all of the grass laid down everywhere, the damage of course and even debris that was still falling from the sky around him. AFAIK, the preliminary "F6" rating for the Xenia tornado came from the original Super Outbreak survey paper by Ted Fujita and his research team. all together. My house faired well, only roof damage, few broken windows, etc. This is pretty rare as far as I know, the worst damage is usually confined to small streaks in the core of the tornado. But I’ve definitely seen others get the occasional F6 discussion like Jarrell or Bridge Creek (in theory, by this time F5 was the official max anyway). The rapid forward motion of this tornado, which was about 70 miles per hour when it moved through Smithville at maximum intensity, meant that the narrow swath subject to the most extreme damage only experienced EF5 winds for a mere 2 to 4 seconds. There have probably been tornadoes that were briefly an F6 on the old scale, but it would have been extremely rare and has never been officially measured. That's gnarly. EF6s produce extreme damage, such as deep ground scouring, cracked foundation slabs or in extreme cases completely May 3, 1999, 23 years ago A massive EF-5 tornado showed no mercy to the city of Moore Oklahoma. I get Xenia was nearby… but Sayler Park straight up looked like it was transported from Kansas. Aug 25, 2024 · IIRC, Fujita said something along the lines of “the difference in damage between an F5 and and F6 would be indistinguishable” and since the scale is a DAMAGE based scale, he removed the F6. That area of EF3 damage can be only a small portion of the damage path if it was a low-end EF3. A PDS tornado warnings means there is sufficient evidence that a powerful tornado is on the ground causing damage. Very visible noodle/stovepipe tornado. both tornadoes have there average official wind speed at 302 mph , however the 300 mph winds in el reno where not touching the ground. Got a tornado picture? Upload it to imgur then link here and tell us a location. If a tornado is capable of doing ef5 damage, it's an ef5 tornado. However, my detached garage right next to my house (8ft or less away) was completely destroyed. Interestingly, the original Fujita scale had an F6 category (of which the lower limit of wind speed was only 1mph faster than the tornado Wurman caught), but it was thought we'd never have one because the damage from one would be indistinguishable from F5 damage (and of course, now we'll definitely never have one since the original scale is no r/tornado • Took a small video of the Tornado in Ottawa (Barrhaven) today. It's safety is credited to engineer Hirai Yanosuke who insisted it have a 14m (46FT) tall sea wall Well, if I can create it, I’d hope I could control it. It was on the ground for just 5 minutes with a path of about 3 kilometers yet resulted in 3 deaths and 53 injuries and $25 million in damage. Imagine if it had slowed down and almost stopped like Jarrell did 😬 it would be the worst damage we had ever seen on earth. Where I’d disagree is that you could make a legit case for EF5 damage in various tornadoes since 2013 (Bremen, Rochelle, etc). The Jarrel tornado produced some of the worst tornado damage in recorded history because it slowed down to a walking pace, and vaporized the Double Creek Estates. F6 Pro has better camera, processor (especially for emulation), and has a better build and design although for some weird reason is still using CGG5 but it's not like it's that big of a deal. If they issue this, it's likely that the tornado will pose a significant threat to someone's life if they are caught in it. Feb 8, 2011 · The damage would look mostly the same as an F5 tornado’s damage. Seeing some of the Joplin tornado damage pictures in another subreddit got me thinking Lets start a thread here for the… On this day 23 years ago, several tornadoes struck Oklahoma, including four tornadoes in North Oklahoma City. I both agree and disagree. The plains supply the perfect breeding ground for Supercell thunderstorms. 2013 Moore, although devastating, is smaller than the other three tornados analyzed, so it ranked 4th. What people don’t understand about the difference between EF4/EF5 is that EF4’s damage indicators look terrible. Killed 5, injured 121 The September 2001 College Park Tornado(EF4)- Tornado went through University of Maryland. A family member’s home was very practically flattened by one of the tornadoes near Omaha today. Adjusted for inflation today that's close to 500 million in 2021. " Since the Fujita scale is based on the severity of damage resulting from high winds, an F6 or an F7 tornado is a theoretical construct. I just managed to catch the Greenfield tornado during it's baby stages, it was not even warned yet. The one on the right was the Carbon tornado, since it had more of a stovepipe appearance. Could be useful for understanding how and why the EF scale works the way it does: 94 votes, 22 comments. that's probably F6 (if the rating existed) damage there. Despite being the only tornado in this comparison that isn’t rated EF5, the 2013 El Reno would have most likely produced EF5 damage had it been centered on a city like Moore. Mar 7, 2024 · The damage was so intense, it completely swept entire neighborhoods of brick homes down to the ground and piled the debris into windrows along the northern edge of the scar path. Jun 26, 2012 · The calculation of windspeeds of violent tornadoes on the basis of damage is nearly impossible, after factoring in tornado size, sub-vortices, size of the inner-core, speed/size of the sub-vortices, whether the tornado had an eye, how large the eye was, how sharp the damage contour was, and the debris amount can all play a role in the damage a The tornado itself doesnt scale off lightning damage, just the lightning procs which scale of lightning damage but not damage over time. The problem with an F6 rating is anything destroyed by an F6 would be destroyed by an F5. However, their final recommendation was indeed F5. It’s pretty silly isn’t it. Structural damage cannot exceed total destruction, which constitutes F5 damage. Then we could confidently rate tornado strength without all this damage indicator nonsense. Welcome to r/bigfoot. Xenia is the most known example of this I think. It doesn't exist. I know F6 tornado designation isn’t used officially, and the only time it was ever used for anything was when the Fujita Scale was first designed as a hypothetical, but if we were to take instances of the most extraordinary damage in modern history (while we had radar and video footage) then how would we distinguish between would could Jul 5, 2004 · There are structures, such as steel-reinforced concrete overpasses and parking garages, that can withstand F5, so hypothetically you can build things that, if hit by an uber tornado, might be able to measure damage caused by winds higher than F5 level. The one I find the most fascinating is the 2011 Phil Campbell tornado for the following reasons. STAY OUT OF AND AWAY FROM DAMAGED AREAS SO FIRST RESPONDERS CAN DO THEIR THING. People are quick to think of the Midwest as “tornado alley” but the southeast gets quite a few of them, and in some ways, more dangerous for reasons like population density and the propensity for rain-wrapped tornadoes as opposed to well-defined, can-see-miles-away sorts. I don’t think ppl really root for monster tornadoes to impact communities, but I agree the important conversation after a major tornado is how to best help the victims, not a rating. It was one of the costliest tornadoes to strike the United States up until then (probably third or fourth at the time) with the Lubbock Texas tornado of 1970 and Topeka Kansas tornado of 1966 being more costly. The fact that a tornado of that size can nearly stall, complete an entire circle of movement, and have several embedded vortices of original Fujita scale F6 strength, just goes to show how unpredictable tornadoes of that magnitude are. The world doesn’t see as many tornadoes as the U. That was before I started storm chasing. When you think of Tornado or Hurricane proof homes think along the lines of Military Let us know if any roads you can see are impassable. The fact Sayler Park isn’t mentioned is confusing. We are his nearest relatives and live about 3 hours away and will be heading down there as soon as the storms move away. It was the deadliest individual tornado of the 1974 Super Outbreak, the 24-hour period between April 3 and April 4, 1974, during which 148 tornadoes touched down in 13 different U. It would never ever be utilized. Still, there was a note beside the F6 rating: “Inconceivable tornado”. Ideas about it being F-6 have been roundly debunked. This. Note: Yes there is room for an EF6 tornado category. Also most tornadoes that are long track storms can be all 6 levels in its life, however it should be rated on maximum windspeed and damage. Crypto The 1977 Birmingham–Smithfield F5 tornado's damage was surveyed by Ted Fujita and he "toyed with the idea of rating the Smithfield tornado an F6". Yes, tornadoes contain updraft columns within their winds. Miraculously the only damage to my uncle’s house was a few missing shingles and his house numbers blew off. So I think it'd be really hard for me and for the team to kill Reddit in that way. Where they go over the forecast, and have fake weather reports, etc. In 1981 there was an F4 that hit West Bend, WI. Not even kidding, a 7mm could hit it, but as soon as the flight model registers any damage you essentially have zero control of the aircraft. Example of damage comparison of EF5 Damage and Jarrel Damage. The point is, above-ground tornado shelters are reinforced and can (and have) withstood EF-5 tornadoes; and the vast majority of people have survived inside these shelters during tornadoes, including severe tornadoes; but no shelter can protect against every single contingency. Which highlights why it is so complicated to gauge tornado strength and wind speeds based on damage alone. Saw Phil Campbell a couple years after that in the dark, and even then I knew there weren’t as many trees as there should’ve been. So, first off, it would almost certainly be an EF-5 in that case. Ted Fujita personally studied the data from both of these F6 tornadoes in the early 70s, but ultimately determined that the F6 rating couldn't apply to either of them. g. And the size of the area where dangerous tornadoes are prevalent and of concern is also very small. Other violent tornadoes that occurred under the right circumstances in Texas west of I-35 include the 1970 Lubbock borderline F6, 1987 Saragosa F4, 2007 Piedras Negras-Eagle Pass tornado outbreak and the Wichita Falls tornadoes (1964 F5 and 1979’s Terrible Tuesday outbreak). There is no reason why the Tornado F. 2011 was a wild year. Dr. The Smithville tornado also pulverised a well built brick home. It began as a moderate-sized tornado, then intensified while moving northeast at about 50 mph (80 km/h). for tree Damage so severe some areas had all the trees gone without a trace or turned into pouder. [14] Dec 17, 2024 · Theoretical Basis for F6 Tornadoes. Meterologist Thomas P. The 1977 Birmingham–Smithfield F5 tornado’s damage was surveyed by Ted Fujita and he “toyed with the idea of rating the Smithfield tornado an F6. states. DO NOT GO OUT DRIVING SEARCHING FOR DAMAGE. Have seen claims that the 2 homes it hit their foundations were also heavily damage / torn out of the ground. In Smithville it was shredded. According to his analysis, the F5 rating was correct based on the original scale, but due to poor building practices and the F scale’s flaws, the minimum wind speed required to cause the damage seen was consistent with an F3 tornado. I’d say EF4 damage looks worse and more chaotic. if the tornado path encounters a foresty area and carries shredded tiny pieces of wood at 200+mph. Reply reply Claque-2 The U. Tornado track width and length was something that wasn't revised until the EF scale in 2007. The tornado caused $1. 4. Tornado: Accounts of Tornadoes in Iowa by John L. It resembles the Tri State Tornado due to the fact it was a power EF5, moved at speeds of 70+ mph, was large, stayed on the ground for 132 mph. That's why the EF5 rating is open ended. The small area of damage they might produce would probably not be recognizable along with the mess produced by F4 and F5 wind that would surround the F6 winds. Xenia was the beginning of the Fujita scale and I’m sure the flyovers had a super hard impact, but what would Ted have thought looking at the I went down there two weeks after the tornado and beforehand I had always thought that people saying "it looked like a bomb went off" after a violent tornado wasn't really quite accurate. To piggyback on this: the original Fujita scale went from F0 to F12, with only F0-F5 intended for use. And remember: what we see as “tornado” is only the bottom 10 percent of the actual tornado, which can reach to 20,000 or even 30,000 feet (as was the case of last week’s tornado in Kentucky). Photos 7-8: F4 tornado in Twister (1996) and 2021 Western Kentucky tornado. EF5 don’t leave anything behind but a slab and a few spoons lodged into a tree from a neighbor two counties away. A community for discussion and posts about weather. It is thought that the more severe damage would be evidenced by specific funnel marks. All about tornadoes! Discord: https://discord. But the tornado scale is typically meters and the storm scale is typically kilometers. Poorly constructed homes will be badly damaged, mobile homes destroyed. and going back to the damage, if i'm right it scoured the ground. Currently, the highest wind speed recorded is associated with the 2013 El Reno tornado in Oklahoma, which reached estimated speeds of 296 mph. It also had the longest continuous stretch of EF5 damage recorded. Lubbock Texas F6 It was estimated between 300 and 318 mph It is also one of the only tornadoes to get the rating of F6 which was the inconceivable tornado It was later downgraded to F5 when the new scale came out. Lots of good discussion. Guin I hear mentioned as the most violent tornado in Alabama’s history, alongside the likes of Deep South tornadoes like Smithville, Rainsville, and Tupelo. But what I saw in Mayfield actually reminded me of pictures of Stalingrad. The 5/11/1999 Loyal Valley, TX tornado was kind of a similar situation, except not quite as violent and not as radically deviant a storm motion. You're free to post your memes… I was hit by a tornado at my old old house back in July of 2018. It's also possible that some weird vortex dynamics and much stronger subvortices appear inside the tornado core that aren't really detectable by radar. 3 billion in 2024 USD) in damage. This is why tornadoes tend to cause more damage for the same wind speed than hurricanes, despite the latter having 3+ hours of winds and tornadoes have at most a few minutes of winds against a building. This tornado is one of those that would arguably approach F6 categorization due to the damage to industrial buildings if F6 were still a thing. Something worth noting in regards to the windspeed of that particular tornado: the windspeeds were measured above ground level, so they were higher than they would have been at ground level where they were causing damage. eg : The Elie Manitoba tornado which it's funnel was only 39 yards wide at F5 intensity and produced winds likely upwards of 250 MPH or the Pampa Texas tornado with a maximum width of 300 yards wide with plausible 3 second sustained 320~ish MPH windspeeds or even the Tracy MN F5 tornado (Undisputed smallest United States rated F5 tornado) F6 : Inconceivable tornado : 319-379 mph : These winds are very unlikely. for slab Damage , however except for this one slab everywhere else seems EF4 or lower. 6 billion in damage, while killing 36 people and injuring 583, and had maximum sustained winds of 318 miles per hour, the strongest ever recorded on Earth- May 3rd, 1999 My parents are from Omaha and we get to hear all about the ‘75 tornado every time we get a tornado warning! Dad’s parents lived on 70th. Jerall Texas F5 and Xenia F6 These two speak for themselves 5. The odds are it would have hit structures well-built enough with one of the sub-vortices to cause EF-5 damage, seeing as we have confirmed wind speeds approaching 300 mph in that tornado. 5: Tuscaloosa EF4+ 2011 . So the size and forward speed of the tornado is directly related to the damage caused by a tornado in complicated ways, in addition to the wind speed. It arguably did even worse damage. 2013 El Reno and May 3rd Moore tornado may have had the highest 100 mph winds blowing in a location for 3 seconds will produce less damage than the same winds blowing for a minute. As originally conceived by Ted Fujita, the answer was yes, as his scale was designed to connect the Beaufort Scale to the Mach Scale (all the way to F11 winds), and the Xenia Tornado of the Original Super Outbreak was given an F6 rating, but later revised to F5. Increased elemental damage would improve both things if you really need to but I see very little synergy to be honest. Thankfully didn't hit many structures and only killed one person, but the damage to vegetation, vehicles and animals was wild. If at any point in a tornado's lifespan it produces EF3 damage, it will be rated an EF3. Several people were plastered with mud and small debris; and a woman was blown out from under the bridge, killed and dismembered. There would be scarcely anything left to judge whether or not it had anything in the realm of "F6 winds". Canada doesn’t get as many tornadoes since it’s further north. I’m thinking about all of this because I don’t think we’re doing justice to EF5 tornadoes…. The one house that did have anchor bolts that got swept clean had surveyors questioned whether debris hit the house and caused the majority of the damage vs straight line winds from the tornado. while el reno 2011 had a max radar wind speed of 295 mph this was when it was only doing EF3 damage, it then went too far away from the radar and then started to do its EF5 damage, it is to note there was a above ground 300 mph tornado proof shelter that got damaged, this is the highest unofficial damage wind speed i have currently herd of a Oct 21, 2021 · While (E)F6 tornadoes may not be impossible, and the categorization does theoretically exist in practicality, there is no need for such a value, as the damage would be complete whether in an (E)F5 or (E)F6+. Fuck Ef5 tornadoes do damage that sometimes you can't compare to one another. The tornado tracked wind speeds of over 318 miles per hour (511 kph), houses were tore down past the foundations, in-house basements were completely destroyed, storm cellars were the only option It and the 1977 Birmingham, AL tornado are the two tornadoes in history that are (officially) the closest to being rated F6. She took 72nd home and was only minutes ahead of the The reason that people argue over the ratings is that it appears, at least to a lot of people, that they make up excuses to not rate tornadoes at EF5. DOW instruments picked up winds close to 300 mph. " --Steve Huffman, CEO of Reddit, April 2023 The only tornado that still terrifies me to this day is El Reno, OK 2013. > 3 km wide at the surface like El Reno 2013 or It was much closer to the epicenter of the 2011 Earthquake than the Fukushima Power Plant, yet it sustained only minor damage and even housed tsunami evacuees. For those of you who are curious as to how the EF scale works and why tornadoes are rated the way they are (something I see in this subreddit every couple days), here’s a link to the actual damage survey training provided by NOAA/NWS to damage surveyors. Aerial photo showing devastation from the Xenia, Ohio tornado, provisionally rated as F6 ± 1. 537 votes, 40 comments. we will have to wait on damage reports, but There have been 3+ tornadoes today already that appear to be EF 2-3. This one came through within 8 miles of me and caused some significant damage to areas I’m at all the time. Long time follower, first time poster. Yeah, its entire development was fascinating. - r/bigfoot is not a debate venue. Jul 3, 2017 · From the same cell that produced the Saugatruck tornado came another possible EF6 wedge, the tornado first touched down near Grand Rapids about 90 minutes after the Saugatruck tornado causing EF1 damage, the tornado reached EF2 intensity before hitting Grand Rapids as a powerful EF3 wedge, the first signs of EF4 intensity was about 25 miles Knew it was going to be Swegle before even clicking on it. Additionally, f6 doesn’t exist at all simply because if a tornado is over the threshold of ef5 damage it’s an ef5. gg/AMUHVgga Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now I feel like for a tornado to be rated F6/EF6 it would have to rip foundations out of the ground It's possible a weather spotter seen a funnel but a warning was never issued and NWS was unaware till reports of damage were coming in post tornado. Even looking at the damage paths of tornados like 2013 Moore, you will see the areas classified as “EF5” are incredible narrow and don’t last long. Since the EF scale is based on damage, a tornado of EF5 strength will have to get lucky and impact an urban area. Both were downgraded to F5s upon further investigation. The tornado formed near Bellbrook, Ohio, southwest of Xenia, at about 4:30 pm EDT. It caused over $30 Million dollars in damage but thankfully had no fatalities. Everyone always says Jarrell but the Phil Campbell tornado was just on a completely different level. [12] The EF5 damage at the hospital occurred only a few minutes after it reached the ground. The only issue is that some tornados that are capable of it, don't do ef5 damage because they don't impact areas that ef4 or ef3 tornados can't destroy. That said, I've read arguments as to whether or not the 1999 Moore tornado should have been classified as an F6. Some tornado experts consider it to have actually done F5 damage based on other photographic evidence; however, the The tornado came, which was extremely strong, The tornado's winds sprayed red-clay mud upward and inward, causing outlines of where people were crouched is now dried mud above the embankment. the problem with an F6 is it's impossible to tell the difference between F6 damage and F5 damage. Being desctruction of structures that can withstand EF5 tornadoes being reinforced concrete and designated tornado shelters. No damage to the interior. Let give you an example let’s say you have two very powerful tornadoes on the ground and let’s say one had radar confirmed wind speeds of 210mph+ but it’s enough to destroy everything. The way you could criticize Reddit is that we weren't a company – we were all heart and no head for a long time. scouring a foot deep trench in the Mississippi topsoil for about two miles while encroaching upon for slab Damage and train track damage. Photos 5-6: F3 tornado in Twister (1996) and December 2023 Hendersonville, Tennessee tornado. These storms are simply that strong. 3 should have the flight characteristics of the space shuttle upon taking any damage. I know I heard the sirens atleast but no clue where it was till someone called and told us to seek shelter. 14 votes, 39 comments. 37K subscribers in the forhonormemes community. So basically, every tornado rated ef5 is an ef5. People there died horrible deaths even though they took the precautionary measures, and lived in better built houses. They leave piles of rubble stacked on top of more rubble. GameStop Moderna Pfizer Johnson & Johnson AstraZeneca Walgreens Best Buy Novavax SpaceX Tesla. Yeah, when I think of Xenia and how it was considered for an F6 rating and what inconceivable damage would actually be, joplin comes to mind, along with the usual culprits like Jarrell, Smithville etc. Most tornadoes are small and only swirl around for a few minutes in empty fields. Xenia was indeed an extreme F5 tornado but the damage it caused was a bit overblown. Measured wind speeds are also currently not even factors that are used to determine the rating of a tornado. The same can be said for weak tornadoes. What should we expect as far as clean up? Is there anything we should bring or expect? The 1974 Xenia tornado was a violent F5 tornado that destroyed a large portion of Xenia and Wilberforce, Ohio, United States on the afternoon of April 3, 1974. Nobody is going to call a 100-m-wide tornado a case of the meso coming to the ground. I have video of it when it matured when it was about to strike the wind turbines. Include pictures if you can. The limited size of impact combined with the small tornado frequented regions ends up yielding a low chance of significant loss of life even during a monster twister. It did it’s damage because A, alot of the houses were poorly built and alot were mobile homes, granulation was intense from what I’ve seen, but also it slowed down to around 3 mph over the estates, the 2 foot trench thing was disproven by the nws, but either way it was a terrifyingly strong tornado, I’d say around 240-280 mark. European style brick and concrete homes will at best fair slightly better than American homes made of wood. Let us know if you are without power. Worcester, MA June 9, 1953: this tornado (and others that occurred between 1950 and the adoption of the Fujita scale in 1971) was rated at F4 postumously in the early '70s based on a limited set of damage photos from the time. Other than that, I believe the 2011 Philadelphia MS tornado scoured soil trenches up to 2 feet deep, which is amongst some of the most intense damage ever seen when it comes to ground scouring. So far as we know, the thermodynamics don’t have much input into the strength of tornadoes. For anyone from professionals to hobbyists. 119K subscribers in the weather community. It's really just a one way street. EF4 tornadic damage can occur with tornadoes in a low (500 J/kg CAPE) but high shear environment and high cape and moderate shear environments or any other combination. there were no ground or grass scouring at the highest rated point for phil campbell. At this point I ran to the basement but now think that i could have stayed a little bit longer and captured it a little bit longer perhaps Photos 1-2: F1 tornado in Twister (1996) and July 2016 Minnesota tornado. They may survive, with heavy damage, an EF2 tornado but would be gone against anything stronger. Likely beating out Joplin for costliest. I saw a yard that must have had sod, the grass was pulled up and folded like a rug about 6’ high. EDIT: While doing some fact checking for this comment, I have found a third tornado nearly rated F6: The 1970 Lubbock, TX tornado was also given a preliminary rating of F6 before Dr. Everything an F6 destroys an F5 would destroy as well. Mostly on Earth. Grazulis said that the Pampa F-4 was plausible for an F-6, stated in his 2001 book "F5-F6 Tornadoes" The El Reno Piedmont tornado was easily among the strongest tornadoes ever recorded. The most unexpected and rare F5 tornado ever it had an unusual direction (went southwest instead of the usual northeast direction) at the time, the way the tornado formed was unexpected, as there were meteorologists who believed that there was very light wind shear to begin with, therefore, the formation of tornadoes were very unlikely. Loyal Valley Texas F4 (May 11th Posted by u/solateor - 15,757 votes and 263 comments The remains of a suburban neighborhood in Moore, Oklahoma after a powerful EF-5 tornado devastated the area. They were fine but several of their neighbors suffered a lot of property damage. I can agree that Smithville was in a league of its own, having seen the aftermath 10 days after. Ted Fujita considered giving that tornado a F6 rating cuz how powerful it was! The 1970 Lubbock Tornado almost got that rating as well, but Fujita considers F6 ratings “inconceivable” so we’re stuck at EF5 for now. Fujita revised it down to F5. EF6s are the strongest tornadoes on the fujita scale with a predicted windspeed of 300+ mph. Stanford Plains Outbreak Tornadoes: Killer Twisters by Victoria Sherrow The Lake Turned Upside Down: The Story of Unthinkable Tragedy and Incredible Survival in the 1969 Outing, Minnesota F4 Tornado by Sue Dugan Moline F6 is good but if you have extra bucks, go with F6 Pro for longevity and overall quality. The slow movement just made the extreme damage path wider. Any tornado has some degree of rotating updraft in contact with the ground and has vorticity beyond the usual mesocyclone. Dr Long Phan (leader of structures group at NIST) published a paper in 1998 about Jarrell. On top of that, it was anticyclonic and to this day remains the strongest documented anticyclonic tornado. There is no f6 on the damage scale. I imagine that debris composition can influence damage a lot, e. c In fact, I’ve heard secondhand some arguments for an EF6 rating for tornadoes that do the type of damage to industrial buildings and machinery that this tornado did. Not to take away from the tragedy and long-term effects of the storm, but as far as damage is concerned, it doesn't deserve its reputation as one of the strongest tornadoes of all time, in my opinion. vsvttxm tttee ndma tqysz cfnik muxys tkusax jorfx ouhot ljt